Jump to content

Talk:Arab–Israeli conflict

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Update info in the Template

[edit]

In the Israeli side,

There are over 5,000 Israeli civilian victims. Only in 1947-2022 over 4,200 Israeli civilians were killed, not including over 800 Israeli civilians were killed in 2023. Showing less than 1,800 Israeli civilians were killed is misleading. IdanST (talk) 16:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Arab side, the most recent estimate of Arab deaths in the Israel–Hamas war is 186,000. Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01169-3/fulltext — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.129.246.100 (talk) 23:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 186,000 number is not 'the most recent estimate of Arab deaths in the Israel–Hamas war'. It is a projection based on a various assumptions. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subset

[edit]

@Parham wiki: What argument are you basing this claim on? [1] The Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates back to early 1900s, meanwhile first instance of the Arab-Israeli conflict came later around 1920. Also, Jordan and Egypt making peace with Israel clearly hasn't solved the IP conflict. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Palestinians are Arabs, not Arabs are Palestinians. Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the core of this conflict. Parham wiki (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal involvement?

[edit]

can anyone let me know what was Portugal's involvement in the conflict? 93.102.33.60 (talk) 10:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Double check death toll source?

[edit]

Not too harsh on me if this is an obvious non-issue.

Citation 18 leads to a (ridiculously biased, but that's besides the point) website that has uncited death tolls for its totals.

The figures they give aren't too wild, save for a couple thousand inflated up or down but I do want to know where it actually sources its figures from. MagiTagi (talk) 15:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source has been removed here. See the JVL entry at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources. JVL is designated as 'generally unreliable' in Wikipedia. Sean.hoyland (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That JVL article is a fine example of why JVL should not be used as a source. Zerotalk 01:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks y'all! MagiTagi (talk) 15:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

This infobox in the lead section is too excessive, what should we do for the infobox? Absolutiva (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]