User talk:Pinkunicorn

Thanks for all the wikification you're doing to the various country entries. I knew it should be done but didn't feel like tackling it yet myself. :-) --Koyaanis Qatsi

Thanks for adding "not" to RulesToConsider. :-) --LMS

Thanks for removing my Western bias from Writing. - RjLesch

You are the hero of the Usian debate. I can't imagine a better resolution. --Jimbo Wales

Oh, some sort of possessiveness about the use of the name 'Britannica' when the material comes from their public domain editions. --MichaelTinkler

Does short story make sense now? --Trimalchio

Yes, now I understand what you're getting at. I'll probably be going through it in a while and making it a bit less colloquial, but on the whole I like it. --Pinkunicorn

There's an old empty subspace of yours over at Pinkunicorn/ToDo. I've been cleaning out 0-length articles from the database in an effort to make the stub finder more useful, can I delete this one? Bryan Derksen, Monday, April 22, 2002

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pinkunicorn! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 146 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sture Allén - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roxen (web server)

The article Roxen (web server) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roxen (web server) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roxen (web server) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxen (web server) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pinkunicorn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grey Baskerville has left the building

After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 23:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Pinkunicorn,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Current Events Barnstar

		The Current Events Barnstar
		I know this is 18 years late, and you don't go on here all that often anymore, but I think you deserve this barnstar for being the user that brought 9/11 to Wikipedia with this edit. When you made that article it was 10:02 local time; the North Tower was still standing. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A 19-year late barnstar for you!

The 9/11 Barnstar

You likely aren't even here anymore, but I don't care, and plus someone has already given you something like this before, but I still don't care. You worked very hard on this: [1]

When you made it, it had been only 3 minutes since the South Tower of the World Trade Center had collapsed, and the North Tower was still burning. That's memorable enough. Hurricanehuron33 (talk) 12:50, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Military of Iceland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Military of Iceland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Military of Iceland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nathanielcwm (talk) 23:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Gulf Stream

Gulf Stream has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. PhotographyEdits (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty

Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]